previous     table of contents     next


APPENDIX D

TABLES OF RESULTS

The following tables summarize some of the information presented in Chapters II, III and IV.  Table 6 shows the distribution of needs and reasoning according to problem situations.  Table 7 shows the distribution of needs and reasoning according to the participants involved.  The remaining tables show distributions for individual participants, indicating problem situations.

1. Needs and proving in different problem situations

 

 

Proving

Unformulated

 

Formulated

 

Mech. Deduction

 

Reasoning by analogy

 

Inductive reasoning

 

Referring to an authority

Explaining to self

F

A

 

 

 

 

Explaining to others

A, F

A, N, O

 

A, O

 

 

Exploring to a goal

A

A

A

A

A, F, G, N, O

 

Exploring without goal

A, F

A

A, F

 

A, F, G

 

Verifying

A

 

A

 

A, F, G, N, O

A, O

Teacher-game

 

A, N

 

 

 

 

Table 6: Distribution of needs and reasoning according to problem situations.

Key to problems:

A: Arithmagon

F: Fibonacci

G: GEOworld

N: Patterns in n3-n

O: Sum rule, Odd+Odd=Even

The Need to Prove
David A Reid
Page 175

To Beginning of appendix D | To End of appendix D


2. Needs and proving by different participants

 

 

Proving

Unformulated

 

Formulated

 

Mech. Deduction

 

Reasoning by analogy

 

Inductive reasoning

 

Referring to an authority

Explaining to self

K

E, K, R

 

 

 

 

Explaining to others

Be, Bi

A, Be, Bi, Co, E, Jo, R

 

Be, Bi, St, W

 

 

Exploring to a goal

Sa

E, Sa

Co, E, K, St, R

W

A, Be, Bi, Co, E, Jo, K, R, St, W

 

Exploring without goal

St

R

Ja, Ch

 

A, Be, Bi, Co, E, Jo, K, R, St, W

 

Verifying

Bi

 

Co

 

A, Be, Bi, Co, E, K, R,  St, W

A, Bi

Teacher-game

 

Co, K, R

 

 

 

 

Table 7: Distribution of needs and proving according to participants involved.

Key to participants:

A:       Anton      (Math 30 student, worked with Colin)

Be:      Ben      (undergraduate student, worked with Wayne)

Bi:        Bill      (Math 13 student, worked with John)  

Ch:      Chris      (undergraduate student, worked with Jane)

Co:      Colin       (Math 30 student, worked with Anton)

E:         Eleanor (Undergraduate student, worked with Rachel)

Ja:        Jane      (undergraduate student, worked with Chris)

Jo:        John      (Math 13 student, worked with Bill)

R:         Rachel (undergraduate student, worked with Eleanor)

Sa:        Sandy      (grade 6 student, informal interview)

St:        Stacey (undergraduate student, worked with Kerry)

The Need to Prove
David A Reid
Page 176

To Beginning of appendix D | To End of appendix D


3. Needs and proving for individual participants

In the following tables letter codes for the problem situations in which the reasoning took place are used.  The key for Table 6 should be consulted.  An “X” indicates that such reasoning occurred several times, but that no specific example is present in Chapter II.  In all other cases a description of the episode in question can be found in the appropriate section of Chapter II or, in the case of Stacey and Kerry, in Chapter III.

First clinical study
Ben

 

Proving

Unformulated

 

Formulated

 

Mech. Deduction

 

Reasoning by analogy

 

Inductive reasoning

 

Referring to an authority

Explaining to self

 

 

 

 

 

 

Explaining to others

A

A

 

A

 

 

Exploring to a goal

 

 

 

 

X

 

Exploring without goal

 

 

 

 

X

 

Verifying

 

 

 

 

X

 

Teacher-game

 

 

 

 

 

 

Table 8: Needs and reasoning — Ben.

Wayne

 

 

Proving

Unformulated

 

Formulated

 

Mech. Deduction

 

Reasoning by analogy

 

Inductive reasoning

 

Referring to an authority

Explaining to self

 

 

 

 

 

 

Explaining to others

 

 

 

A

 

 

Exploring to a goal

 

 

 

A

X

 

Exploring without goal

 

 

 

 

X

 

Verifying

 

 

 

 

X

 

Teacher-game

 

 

 

 

 

 

Table 9: Needs and reasoning — Wayne.  

The Need to Prove
David A Reid
Page 177

To Beginning of appendix D | To End of appendix D


Stacey

 

Proving

Unformulated

 

Formulated

 

Mech. Deduction

 

Reasoning by analogy

 

Inductive reasoning

 

Referring to an authority

Explaining to self

 

 

 

 

 

 

Explaining to others

 

 

 

A

 

 

Exploring to a goal

 

 

A

 

X

 

Exploring without goal

A

 

 

 

X

 

Verifying

 

 

 

 

X

 

Teacher-game

 

 

 

 

 

 

Table 10: Needs and reasoning — Stacey.

Kerry

 

 

Proving

Unformulated

 

Formulated

 

Mech. Deduction

 

Reasoning by analogy

 

Inductive reasoning

 

Referring to an authority

Explaining to self

F

A

 

 

 

 

Explaining to others

 

 

 

 

 

 

Exploring to a goal

 

 

A

 

X

 

Exploring without goal

 

 

 

 

X

 

Verifying

 

 

 

 

X

 

Teacher-game

 

A

 

 

 

 

Table 11: Needs and reasoning — Kerry.  

The Need to Prove
David A Reid
Page 178

To Beginning of appendix D | To End of appendix D


Eleanor

 

 

Proving

Unformulated

 

Formulated

 

Mech. Deduction

 

Reasoning by analogy

 

Inductive reasoning

 

Referring to an authority

Explaining to self

 

A

 

 

 

 

Explaining to others

 

A

 

 

 

 

Exploring to a goal

 

A

A

 

X

 

Exploring without goal

 

 

 

 

X

 

Verifying

 

 

 

 

X

 

Teacher-game

 

 

 

 

 

 

Table 12: Needs and reasoning — Eleanor.

Rachel

 

 

Proving

Unformulated

 

Formulated

 

Mech. Deduction

 

Reasoning by analogy

 

Inductive reasoning

 

Referring to an authority

Explaining to self

 

A

 

 

 

 

Explaining to others

 

A

 

 

 

 

Exploring to a goal

 

 

A

 

X

 

Exploring without goal

 

A

 

 

X

 

Verifying

 

 

 

 

X

 

Teacher-game

 

A

 

 

 

 

Table 13: Needs and reasoning — Rachel.  

The Need to Prove
David A Reid
Page 179

To Beginning of appendix D | To End of appendix D


Jane

 

 

Proving

Unformulated

 

Formulated

 

Mech. Deduction

 

Reasoning by analogy

 

Inductive reasoning

 

Referring to an authority

Explaining to self

 

 

 

 

 

 

Explaining to others

 

 

 

 

 

 

Exploring to a goal

 

 

A

 

X

 

Exploring without goal

 

 

X

 

X

 

Verifying

 

 

 

 

X

 

Teacher-game

 

 

 

 

 

 

Table 14: Needs and reasoning — Jane.

Chris

 

 

Proving

Unformulated

 

Formulated

 

Mech. Deduction

 

Reasoning by analogy

 

Inductive reasoning

 

Referring to an authority

Explaining to self

 

 

 

 

 

 

Explaining to others

 

 

 

 

 

 

Exploring to a goal

 

 

A

 

 

 

Exploring without goal

 

 

X

 

 

 

Verifying

 

 

 

 

 

 

Teacher-game

 

 

 

 

 

 

Table 15: Needs and reasoning — Chris.  

The Need to Prove
David A Reid
Page 180

To Beginning of appendix D | To End of appendix D


North School study
Bill

 

 

Proving

Unformulated

 

Formulated

 

Mech. Deduction

 

Reasoning by analogy

 

Inductive reasoning

 

Referring to an authority

Explaining to self

 

 

 

 

 

 

Explaining to others

F

O

 

O

 

 

Exploring to a goal

 

 

 

 

X

 

Exploring without goal

F

 

 

 

X

 

Verifying

A

 

 

 

 

O

Teacher-game

 

 

 

 

 

 

Table 16: Needs and reasoning — Bill.

John

 

 

Proving

Unformulated

 

Formulated

 

Mech. Deduction

 

Reasoning by analogy

 

Inductive reasoning

 

Referring to an authority

Explaining to self

 

 

 

 

 

 

Explaining to others

 

O

 

 

 

 

Exploring to a goal

 

 

 

 

X

 

Exploring without goal

 

 

 

 

X

 

Verifying

 

 

 

 

X

 

Teacher-game

 

 

 

 

 

 

Table 17: Needs and reasoning — John.  

The Need to Prove
David A Reid
Page 181

To Beginning of appendix D | To End of appendix D


Colin

 

 

Proving

Unformulated

 

Formulated

 

Mech. Deduction

 

Reasoning by analogy

 

Inductive reasoning

 

Referring to an authority

Explaining to self

 

 

 

 

 

 

Explaining to others

 

A, N

 

 

 

 

Exploring to a goal

 

 

A

X

 

 

Exploring without goal

 

 

 

X

 

 

Verifying

 

 

A

X

 

 

Teacher-game

 

N

 

 

 

 

Table 18: Needs and reasoning — Colin.

Anton

 

 

Proving

Unformulated

 

Formulated

 

Mech. Deduction

 

Reasoning by analogy

 

Inductive reasoning

 

Referring to an authority

Explaining to self

 

 

 

 

 

 

Explaining to others

 

N

 

 

 

 

Exploring to a goal

 

 

 

 

X

 

Exploring without goal

 

 

 

 

X

 

Verifying

 

 

 

 

A

A

Teacher-game

 

 

 

 

 

 

Table 19: Needs and reasoning — Anton.  

The Need to Prove
David A Reid
Page 182

To Beginning of appendix D | To End of appendix D


Sandy

 

 

Proving

Unformulated

 

Formulated

 

Mech. Deduction

 

Reasoning by analogy

 

Inductive reasoning

 

Referring to an authority

Explaining to self

 

 

 

 

 

 

Explaining to others

 

 

 

 

 

 

Exploring to a goal

A

A

 

 

 

 

Exploring without goal

 

 

 

 

 

 

Verifying

 

 

 

 

 

 

Teacher-game

 

 

 

 

 

 

Table 20: Needs and reasoning — Sandy.

The Need to Prove
David A Reid
Page 183

To Beginning of appendix D | To End of appendix D


previous    table of contents     next