TABLE OF CONTENTS
Frontispiece |
ii |
Title page |
iii |
Dedication |
v |
Abstract |
vii |
Acknowledgements |
ix |
Figures & Tables |
xiv |
|
|
INTRODUCTION |
1 |
A note on transcripts and diagrams |
4 |
CHAPTER I: PROOF AND PROVING | 6 |
1. What is proving? |
6 |
|
7 |
What is proving for professional mathematicians? |
8 |
2. Why do people prove? |
10 |
|
10 |
|
11 |
Other ways mathematicians verify |
13 |
Why do students prove? |
14 |
Do students prove? |
14 |
Uses of proving |
15 |
Researching the need to prove |
17 |
CHAPTER II: NEEDS AND PROVING |
21 |
1. Explaining |
24 |
Explaining – Formulated proving – Preformal proof |
25 |
Rachel and Eleanor explain the formulae found inthe Arithmagon situation |
25 |
Ben’s formulated proving to explain to others |
27 |
Colin and Anton explain the origin of their Arithmagon formula |
28 |
Colin and Anton’s formulated explanation that n3 - n is a multiple of 6 |
29 |
Bill and John’s explanations by formulated proving |
30 |
Explaining–Unformulated Proving |
32 |
|
32 |
Ben’s unformulated explaining to others |
33 |
Bill’s unformulated explanation that F3nis even |
34 |
Explaining–Analogy |
35 |
|
35 |
Rachel, Ben and Wayne attempt to explain "Why 2?" |
36 |
Summary |
38 |
2. Exploring |
39 |
Exploring – Unformulated proving |
39 |
Bill’s unformulated exploration |
40 |
Sandy’s formulation of his unformulated proving to explore |
40 |
Exploring – Formulated proving – Preformal proof |
41 |
Rachel’s explorations by formulated proving |
42 |
Eleanor’s explorations by formulated proving |
43 |
Exploring – Mechanical Deduction – Preformal proof |
44 |
Exploring – Analogy |
45 |
Exploring – Inductive reasoning |
46 |
Summary |
47 |
3. Verifying |
49 |
Verifying – Unformulated proving |
48 |
Verifying – Mechanical deduction – Preformal proof |
49 |
Verifying – Inductive reasoning |
50 |
Verifying – Authority |
50 |
|
51 |
Bill’s rejection of analogy, induction, and deduction in the face of authority |
51 |
Verifying in school |
52 |
Summary |
52 |
4. Teacher-games |
52 |
Teacher-game/Verifying – Formulated proving |
53 |
|
53 |
Kerry proves to verify that F3nis even |
54 |
Teacher-game/Verifying – Formulaic proof making |
54 |
Summary |
55 |
5. Synthesis |
56 |
Verification |
56 |
Explanation |
57 |
Exploration |
57 |
Teacher games and other social contexts |
58 |
CHAPTER III: KERRY, STACEY AND THE ARITHMAGON: REASONING IN ACTION |
59 |
1. Mechanical deduction to explore |
59 |
2. Unformulated proving to explore |
60 |
3. Mechanical deduction to explore |
61 |
4. "Generalizing" |
62 |
5. Inductive and deductive exploring |
62 |
6. Inductive reasoning to explore |
66 |
7. Unformulated proving to explore |
67 |
8. Reasoning by analogy to explain |
67 |
9. Inductive reasoning to explore |
68 |
10. Reasoning by analogy to explain |
69 |
11. Further exploring |
70 |
12. Formulated proving to explain, interpreting a semi-formal proof |
70 |
CHAPTER IV: CONSTRAINTS ON PROVING |
72 |
1. Individual Differences |
72 |
|
74 |
2. Social constraints |
75 |
Eleanor and Rachel |
75 |
Rachel |
75 |
Eleanor |
76 |
Bill and John |
77 |
3. The prompts |
77 |
Arithmagon |
77 |
Fibonacci |
78 |
GEOworld |
79 |
Summary |
79 |
CHAPTER V: TEACHING PROVING |
80 |
1. Proving in the Curriculum |
80 |
Alberta |
80 |
The Standards |
82 |
2. Current practices in teaching proving |
83 |
Schoenfeld on teaching for examinations |
83 |
Teaching at North and South Schools |
84 |
3. Experiments in teaching proving |
85 |
Fawcett’s research |
85 |
Research by Balacheff et al. |
87 |
Research by Lampert in the United States |
88 |
Weaknesses of teaching based on the courtroom metaphor |
88 |
4. Speculations on improving teaching |
89 |
5. Why teach proving? |
92 |
CHAPTER VI: PROVING IN SOCIETY |
95 |
1. What is Rationalism? |
95 |
2. Rationalism’s Weaknesses |
97 |
Deduction and Absolute truth |
97 |
Significance of Gödel’s Theorem outside ofmathematics |
100 |
Rationalism is not universally applicable |
103 |
|
104 |
3. Rationalism and other modes of thought |
106 |
CHAPTER VII: REASONING AND RESEARCH FROM AN ENACTIVIST PERSPECTIVE |
110 |
1. Enactivism |
110 |
2. Enactivism and reasoning |
114 |
3. Enactivism and research |
119 |
Basic principles |
120 |
Some specifics |
121 |
4. A few parting words on Enactivism, proving, and teaching |
122 |
REFERENCES | 124 |
APPENDICES |
|
A: RELATED LITERATURE |
132 |
1. Other publications by researchers referenced in the main text |
132 |
2. Discussions of the nature of proof in mathematics |
134 |
3. Research on students’ understanding of the conceptof proof |
134 |
4. Useful literature reviews |
136 |
B: DESIGN AND DÉROULEMENT OF THE RESEARCHSTUDIES | 137 |
1. The North School study |
137 |
Context |
137 |
Outline |
137 |
Participants |
138 |
2. The South School study |
138 |
Context |
138 |
Outline |
139 |
Participants |
139 |
3. The first clinical study |
139 |
Context and outline |
139 |
Participants |
140 |
4. The second clinical study |
140 |
Participants |
141 |
5. Other Studies |
141 |
Sandy |
141 |
Central High School |
141 |
6. Methods |
141 |
7. Prompts |
142 |
Arithmagon |
143 |
Fibonacci |
143 |
GEOworld |
144 |
C: MATHEMATICAL ACTIVITY TRACES | 146 |
1. MATs from the study at North School |
146 |
Mathematical Activity Traces for the Math 13 Pair, Bill & John |
146 |
|
146 |
Arithmagon |
148 |
First Interview |
150 |
Second Interview |
153 |
Mathematical Activity Traces for the Math 30 Pair, Colin & Anton |
155 |
|
155 |
Arithmagon |
157 |
First Interview |
159 |
Second Interview |
161 |
2. MATs from the first clinical study |
163 |
Group I: Ben and Wayne |
163 |
|
163 |
Group II: Stacey and Kerry |
166 |
|
166 |
Fibonacci |
168 |
Group III: Eleanor and Rachel |
169 |
Arithmagon |
169 |
Fibonacci |
172 |
Group IV: Jane & Chris |
173 |
|
173 |
D: TABLES OF RESULTS | 175 |
1. Needs and proving in different problem situations |
175 |
2. Needs and proving by different participants |
176 |
3. Needs and proving for individual participants |
177 |
First clinical study |
177 |
|
177 |
Wayne |
177 |
Stacey |
178 |
Kerry |
178 |
Eleanor |
179 |
Rachel |
179 |
Jane |
180 |
Chris |
180 |
North School study |
181 |
|
181 |
John |
181 |
Colin |
182 |
Anton |
182 |
Sandy |
183 |
E: METHODS OF SOLUTION | 184 |
1. Arithmagon |
184 |
Specific solutions to the puzzle |
184 |
The constraints method |
184 |
Systems of equations |
185 |
The method of false position |
185 |
General solutions |
186 |
|
186 |
Stacey and Kerry’s method |
186 |
Colin and Anton’s method |
187 |
Eleanor’s method |
187 |
General problems |
188 |
2. Fibonacci |
188 |
Properties of every nthFibonacci number |
189 |
Generalizations of the Fibonacci sequence |
189 |